In a recent analysis of online communication on Facebook, researchers demonstrated how social media and an individual’s sense of identity can be used to dehumanize entire groups of people. The study looked at the breakdown of communication between Facebook users with opposing political viewpoints.
The findings, published in the journal Social Media + Society, suggest the need to foster more healthy communication online.
“Fundamentally, we wanted to examine how online platforms can normalize hatred and contribute to dehumanization,” said Dr. Jessica Jameson, co-author of a paper on the work and a professor of communication at North Carolina State University. “And we found that an established model of the role identity plays in intractable conflicts seems to explain a great deal of this behavior.”
The researchers found that the breakdown between groups with opposing viewpoints tends to happen in three stages: Seeing the other group as a threat to your identity; distorting or dismissing any new information from the other group as irrelevant; and finally, becoming locked in your own viewpoint of the other group.
For the study, Jameson worked with a research team at The Hebrew University of Jerusalem to evaluate online conversations on a Facebook page that was noteworthy in Israel for propagating right-wing hate speech. Specifically, the team looked at comments on the page that were related to other Israeli Jews who commenters felt were not politically right wing.
“We found that the language used in these Facebook interactions hewed very closely to three stages we see in Terrell Northrup’s theory of intractable conflict,” said Jameson. “One stage is the threat, meaning that the people in one group perceive another group as a threat to their identity.”
“For example, one representative comment we found was that ‘The leftists are our devil, because of their existence the country is being destroyed and the army weakened’.”
“A second stage is distortion. This basically means that the first group will not engage with new information regarding the other group, instead distorting it or dismissing it as irrelevant for some reason,” said Jameson.
“For example, ‘I don’t know if I really want to know the answer to the question of whether the thinking of the left is due to infinite stupidity or infinite naivete’.”
“A third stage is rigidification, where people become locked into their positions, making it difficult or impossible to change their views of the other group,” Jameson said.
“This is where dehumanization occurs, and we see people referring to the political left as ‘cockroaches,’ ‘vermin,’ or ‘stinking dogs.’ And when people stop seeing members of a group as human — that’s dangerous.”
“Look, when social media tools are used for community-building, or to provide social support, or to engage people who have otherwise remained silent, they are very valuable,” Jameson said.
“The concern that is raised by our work here is that when one identity group uses these platforms to dehumanize another group, there is no possibility for conversation with those who have different views. And things may potentially become dangerous.”
“I don’t think having social media companies police their own sites is the answer,” she said. “But I do think this work highlights the need for more efforts aimed at fostering healthy communication between groups.”
Source: North Carolina State University
Source: PsychCentral How Social Media Platforms Can Contribute to Dehumanization